Can You Have A Pet Platypus

Week 11 of 52 10 of 52 Week

Hello everyone. For my challenge this week as part of the project 52 weeks in photo I took a picture at the beach with my digital camera . I took a trip to an island to get my Nikon D80 and use it happily! I found this pretty wood and it inspired me so here's the topic of the week! Remember that you can see all my photos of project 52 weeks slideshow.

So here's the final result:



I used an average opening for a reasonable depth of field. I think the cliche would be less beautiful if the background was more blurred ... Mere opinion of me! As it was I who took the picture, my opinion is worth more than others! Sorry for those who think otherwise;) I had to adjust the white balance as the original was too yellow for my taste ... Here
details of the setting used ...

Exif data:
Camera: Nikon D80
Lens: Nikon 28-80mm
Shutter Speed: 1 / 60 sec.
Aperture: f/11 ISO
: 100
Flash: Not
Focal Length: 35mm White Balance
: 6 300k

I got behind Project picture ... Say this summer, other projects have caught my attention! But it does not matter. We will say that we have life ahead of us! I said 52 weeks in photography, I never said that those 52 weeks were to be consecutive!
You can left click on Project 52 weeks in photography to show the other weeks.


good week!


View slideshow of all photos

_____________________________________________
You might also like these items:
Photo Tips for Summer
Extension Tube for Nikon
Sunshades Free Lens
family photos at Christmas
Photography classes the rule of thirds

Funny Baby Congratulation Message

À propos de l'Initiative sur la peine de mort

What I think, among other things, the initiative on the death penalty, which was withdrawn before being truly launched (text I have written elsewhere):

I do think that there are limits in the popular vote. The text of the intitative provided inter alia that the death penalty would also apply to pending proceedings , therefore crimes committed under a legal order does not provide (yet) the death penalty. Nulla poena sine lege : a violation of this principle I would actually rather difficult to digest. The text of the initiative:

The Constitution is amended as follows:

Art. 10, par. 1 and 3

Every human being has a right to life. Anyone who commits murder or assassination in a contest with a sexual act on a child, sexual coercion or rape loses the right to life and is punishable by death. The death penalty is banned in all other cases.

3 Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment are forbidden. The death penalty is reserved.

Art. 123a para. 4 (new)

4 A person who commits a murder or assassination in a contest with a sexual act on a child, sexual coercion or rape is run independently of any expertise or scientific knowledge. Confederation carries the death penalty. The capital execution took place within three months after the entry into force of conviction. The court sets the terms and the date of execution.

II
The transitional provisions of the Constitution are amended as follows:
Art. 197, ch. 82 (new)

8. Transitional provision on Art. 10, par. 1 and 3, and 123a, para. 4 (Death penalty)
ss. 10, par. 1 and 3, and 123a, para. 4, concerning the death penalty come into force upon the people and the cantons have accepted. They are applicable to offenses committed before their entry into force whose trial has not yet entered into force on that date; provisions contrary to international treaties do not apply.

That being said, I do not know how to solve this dilemma once and for all. Either it is the people who slice or a committee of "experts" (judges, politicians, civil servants ). We have to obviously, the Swiss system is constantly in danger of imbalance (between the pole "democracy" and that "the rule of law"). As a liberal I believe that certain rights are not negotiable, they are there before the state and independent of it. The individual is the sole master. If a majority wants to abolish property rights, I have a moral right to take (my) weapons. However, some questions may be submitted probably older to all citizens (and therefore the community), to the extent that they are all affected (And my basic rights are not implicated). Expert commissions, they, supposedly "better" represent the community and think about his place, then have no reason to be.

But again, this is essentially a discussion of natural law.