I am nevertheless always surprised with what self-evident Schmalosigkeit the state law breaks when it comes to his own Interests goes.
The Netherlands buy bank details
(...)
The Dutch government has from an unnamed informant a list with data on "a few hundred and get Dutch, who presumably through bank accounts in foreign tax evasion shall have. This is a letter from the Financial Secretary Jan Kees de Jager, to parliament and a communiqué of the Ministry of Finance to see.
The list contains name, address, account number, balance and telephone number of the "Black savers." The informant will receive compensation , the amount of the Data quality and yield depend on the Treasury's financial, but not a ceiling of "several hundred thousand euros" would exceed. (...)
is completely clear that this involves the offense of receiving stolen goods. The "informant" has unlawfully obtained information and then sells them to the state, intending to use this information in their own interest. A private person would do the same is, would follow this law. The state, however, as such, is not law, but above the law. He turns and watches outside all norms, as the only justification he knows the own "public Interest ". The traditional natural law idea that the state can have only those rights and must, which has entrusted the people of free will is no longer valid. Oblivion is here that the state only due to this delegation mechanism legitimacy ever relates. The fact that usurp the representatives of the state systematically and repeatedly granted to them were even ready to never occur, the state loses its legitimacy. He outclassed by the fact the mere arbitrary robbers.
