Jenna Jameson Nipple Piercing

For open petrol station shops

you want to sell and now we want, why can not there just bureaucrats ? Keep out of it

Switzerland enjoys as home address, but also as a business location an excellent international reputation. The Swiss quality of life include consumer-friendly store opening times.

In larger cities and urban areas are gas stations, shops that are open around the clock, an identifiable need. People who work at night - police officers, taxi drivers, shift workers, etc. - are grateful for the opportunity to buy at some gas stations may also at night. This will

the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) to stop now and give the stations concerned no permits. That is why the " IG freedom "- a non-partisan organization with 2,000 members - a petition launched to support the filling station shops. We want a business-friendly policy, which the concerns of consumers are the center - not the concern of the officials!

Please support our petition - please contact one of the attractive 24-hour shops at petrol stations.

Now on http://www.tankstellen-shops.ch sign the petition!

Alice In Wonderlandcake

no to Big Brother biometric

(Version française ici )

The Swiss people will soon vote on the introduction of biometric passports , which can save by using an electronic chip biometric data of the holder. All major parties have adopted the slogan-Yes, with the exception of most parties Jung, Young Socialists, Young Liberals, JSVP, the young and the young Greens are EPP other hand - and rightly so.

The most important reason for a monstrous NO 17 May is the introduction of a database (Information System Identity Documents, "ISA"), which stores all the biometric data of the holder and is entrusted to the Federal Office of Police. So in future, such as the fingerprint to be placed behind each Swiss citizen to the police authorities of the Federation. This would be a complete novelty in Switzerland, as such information previously provided to the authorities of the country were known or accessible as the person concerned is no crime had been guilty Well, then should suddenly be all honest Swiss citizens are fichiert standard biometric, and While on computerized way, in defiance of the presumption of innocence and without any possibility of appeal.

At this point in the mega scandal simply reminded of the beginning Switzerland had shaken the 90's, when 900,000 Citizens (of that time about 6.7 million!) Was fichiert by the federal police were. For the former over-zealous officials were trivial motives often sufficient reason for the stasi -in the accounts: (! Constitutionally permissible) Participation in political meetings left-wing groups, a love relationship with an allegedly subversive person or "suspicious" occupational activities were sufficient for the opening a personal Fiche ( this French-language documentary takes one to almost the breath). This gigantic government spying operation was revealed only because a parliamentary commission of inquiry PUK interested in the course of Kopp affair for the police practices of the federal government and the cantons. The "Fichenaffäre" has shaken Switzerland in the episode to their foundations and damaged the confidence of the Swiss in their state long term. The memory lasted but apparently not very long, because not even 20 years after these events, we consider now therefore turn to speak to the State the means to prevent it from ultra modern instruments for the total surveillance of citizens there. Of course, the politicians and the police do not become tired claim that the use of the database search purposes not yet provided possible and that foreign authorities have no access. Such a database is, however, necessary to facilitate the replacement of identity documents and assess the identity of the applicant to be able to more reliably. Also would be so there is no way an ID card under a false identity is much more difficult this way. "

Even if such promises are certainly encouraging, so the danger of state abuse can not be excluded. Moreover, it is exactly but most of all those involved in the leadership of the authorities here said that fear in a country the most and controlled. The Fichenaffäre In the supposedly liberal and democratic Switzerland delivered in this respect the resounding proof. The police authorities is fundamentally distrust rather always and everywhere. The introduction of a common computerized system to collect biometric data on all Swiss would be an unprecedented expansion of police state like in Switzerland. Why should one day not the same blood type, a sperm sample or even the DNA stored? A relevant change in the law would come along just subtle enough, coupled with the necessary "outside political necessity." In truth, it is now to introduce a biometric Big Brother . In comparison, the typewriter and blueprint based Fichenstaat the cold war is proving to be extremely dangerous. The official pledge of self-restraint and respect for fundamental rights are worthless, given the current political developments which condones it always wider disruption of the interventionist state of privacy in the name of whatever kind "general interest". A state of the funds not used voluntarily, he holds, as a merely temporary tax increase: such do not exist. Even the American founding father Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790) wusste:

Those Who Would Give Up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, Deserve Neither Liberty nor Safety .

Bench Store Net Income

Non au flicage biométrique

(Deutsche Version yesterday )

The Swiss electorate is asked to vote on the introduction of biometric passports called capable of recording biometric data Using a chip (a "chip" Electronics). All major parties except the Swiss People's Party are in favor of the law in question. However, "Youth" of the Socialist Party, Radical Party, the Greens and the Evangelical party and other groups are opposed that. Why they are they right?

The major argument to say "No" May 17 is the parallel introduction of a database ("ISA") or all the biometric information of the holder will be filed. For example, the fingerprint will be registered with the police authorities of the Confederation. An absolute novelty, since until now, such information was not available to the authorities as the person concerned had committed no offense criminal. Suddenly, all honest citizens will therefore be flagged in the future. And this computerized and without recourse.

must then remember the mega-scandal of 1990, when 900,000 people living in Switzerland (about 6.7 million at the time!) Were stuck by the federal police, for reasons often quite benign : Participation in political demonstrations left, romantic relationships with people deemed subversive, professional activities "shady" (see this documentary astounding at the time). The scandal erupted when by chance when a commission of inquiry Parliament took an interest in policing the Confederation and the cantons. The "Case of cards" has profoundly shaken the confidence of the Swiss in their state. Not for long however, since rediscussing now provide ultra-modern facilities to the State for it to acquire a powerful tool for monitoring and total. Of course, politicians and police services are quick to promise that abuses are not possible, the use of the database for investigative purposes is not permitted and provided that foreign authorities do not have access to the system. However, such a system would be needed to facilitate the replacement of identity documents and make more reliable identification of the owner. Moreover, "fraudulently obtaining a passport under a false identity will be considerably more difficult."

If these promises are certainly welcome, it remains to be seen as the possibility of abuse can not be ruled out. Moreover, it is precisely the authorities in charge of such a system are most likely to occur in any political system. The case sheets has delivered the shocking evidence of the country so-called liberal and democratic of Switzerland. The introduction of a system computerized and widespread biometric data capture (why not one day be as blood type, a sample of semen or DNA?) on all the Swiss would constitute an unprecedented extension of the Swiss police state: A Big Brother Biometric . The promise of self-limitation of the authorities and respect for individual rights are worthless to a development policy which requires that the interventionist state interferes a little bit more in areas purely private-course always in the name of "general interest".

The State Police has the means and not in use, c'est comme une augmentation d'un impôt provisoire : ça n'existe pas. Il est utile de citer ici le père fondateur américain Benjamin Franklin (1706 - 1790):

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety .