What Are The Side Effects Of Amoxic8illin

A

Supreme Court says Americans have right to guns

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Americans have a right to own guns for self-defense and hunting, the justices' first major pronouncement on gun rights in U.S. history.

The court's 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia's 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment. The decision went further than even the Bush administration wanted, but probably leaves most firearms laws intact.

The court had not conclusively interpreted the Second Amendment since its ratification in 1791. The amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The basic issue for the justices was whether the amendment protects an individual's right to own guns no matter what, or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia. (...)

As gun-control laws merely manage to give a competitive advantage to outlaws (burglars, murderers, the police state and other vilains), this judgement is a great step towards more individual liberty.

Washington Dc Tourist Maps Printable

Well done, Ireland!

Ireland rejects EU reform treaty with 53.4 percent "no" vote

While the Eurocrats tried to double-cross some 500 million citizens with the so-called "Lisbon reform treaty" after the aborted "constitution" in 2005, the brave Irish people has shown the red card to Brussels. The reform treaty does not contain especially bad things compared to the existing treaty. But the Irish vote is a good thing because it hampers European integration as it is presently understood by Eurocrats, namely: more centralization, more taxes, less liberty. The Irish have been the only people to be able to express their opinion on the issue. This mere fact that a sufficient reason to reject the reform treaty and the buraucracy it stands for.

Rapid Heartbeat And Sport

loss of reality

From today's press conference Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf on voting results:

The decision of the Central Committee of the SVP Switzerland is not surprising. "I think that the exclusion of a party, a cantonal exclusion without precedent," said the Grisons. Objective could be the SVP Graubünden accused of anything. The whole thing they agree very thoughtful, it was a collective punishment. But it was not partisan and will not continue to be. Currently they sit still for the SVP in the Bundesrat. You've discussed each step with the SVP Graubünden and will now analyze the situation with her now. The party will mobilize all positive forces. "I'll stay with my SVP Graubünden here," said the Federal Councillor.

now she is therefore a member of any party of the order off, should not even reach the green water. Ms Widmer-Schlumpf is not only no longer a member of a relevant party at the federal level, but it takes absolutely no political power more serious. Thus it has in the government really lost anything. Ms Widmer-Schlumpf now seems to acknowledge but not to do that she was alone, standing at the beginning of this development and with the political arch-enemies into bed. For all the political agreement I had with her wealthy, this woman is not truly portable.